It discusses CEO confidence in economic prospects for 2022, comparing it with post-COVID and initial survey results, highlighting restored confidence.

The slide highlights CEO confidence levels regarding their own growth prospects for 2018 compared to 2017, emphasizing caution in most regions except North America.

The slide tracks the historical confidence of CEOs in their company's revenue growth and the global economy, showing trends from 1998 to 2017.

This slide analyzes the rebound in CEO confidence post-2020, showcasing a survey that indicates a shift towards more positive revenue growth expectations. It includes a historical comparison to pre-pandemic levels, providing insight into the evolving sentiment among business leaders regarding economic prospects.

The slide analyzes the declining confidence levels among CEOs regarding their organization's revenue growth prospects, with a focus on the impacts of external factors and market conditions.

It emphasizes a cautious outlook among CEOs regarding their organization's three-year growth prospects, with confidence levels fluctuating over the years.

The slide analyzes how the appointment of a new CEO and M&A activity affect cost reduction efforts globally and regionally, highlighting differences in likelihood and impact.

Highlights CEO perspectives on corporate purpose during COVID-19. Most CEOs report stronger emotional connection to purpose and its role in decision-making. Includes direct quote from Alison Rose and data from KPMG 2020 CEO Outlook.

This slide analyzes the dramatic shift in CEOs' economic outlook, highlighting a steep increase in pessimism about global economic growth over the past two years.

The slide depicts the optimism of CEOs regarding global economic improvement, backed by historical survey data. The bar graph shows a significant rise in positive outlook, setting a historical context to understand current and future CEO sentiments in the business world.

Highlights global CEO sentiment on long-term economic growth. Confidence in the global economy for the next 3 years rebounded to 71% by August 2022 after pandemic-driven lows. The narrative emphasizes recovery optimism post-COVID-19.

This slide illustrates the shifting focus of China CEOs from the US to alternative growth territories like Australia, based on surveyed rankings. It's valuable for discussions on global market dynamics and strategic growth territory identification.

Survey results showing CEO optimism about global economic growth over the next year, based on responses from 2012 to 2018.

The slide highlights how CEOs' focus on countries for growth has shifted over time, based on PwC survey data.

It delves into the shift in CEO perspectives on climate change, comparing data from 2010 and 2020. The bar charts highlight the increased recognition of climate change initiatives' benefits. This slide would be relevant in discussions regarding business strategies in the context of environmental sustainability and corporate responsibility.

Illustrates CEO perspectives on global economic growth, with a focus on the changes in optimism and confidence over recent years.

Compares CEO outlook on global economic growth by region, showing a significant rise in those expecting decline.

Depicts a shift in CEO sentiment towards economic growth, showcasing an increasing trend in pessimism. Useful for discussions on market sentiment and planning.

Reflects CEOs' confidence in their organizations' revenue growth prospects in contrast to their views on global economic growth, indicating a cautious outlook.

The slide conveys regional CEO confidence levels in revenue growth, showing a declining trend over both short and medium terms. The slide is used to analyze and present economic outlook trends to stakeholders.

Displays CEOs' concerns by region regarding various economic, policy, and social threats.

This slide presents data from PwC's 23rd annual survey, showing changes in CEO optimism and the perceived top threats in 2020. It contrasts CEO outlook over four years and highlights top concerns like over-regulation and trade conflicts, making it useful for analyzing market trends.

It discusses CEOs' perspectives on data adequacy for decision-making over ten years, relevant to organizational change management and technology strategy sessions.

The slide displays CEO growth ambitions outside their home markets, showing a trend of declining certainty. It illustrates the markets considered for expansion, hinting at strategic business development and market analysis.

The slide provides a global comparison of trust in business leaders. Indonesia scores highest, Japan and Hungary lowest. Most countries show more distrust than trust.

This slide highlights the priorities of CEOs in adopting digital and flexible business models in response to COVID-19, showcasing survey results on business model changes.

This slide discusses how CEOs have adapted to the pandemic by balancing growth opportunities with human and digital transformation. It emphasizes connected leadership, digital innovation, human capability, and ESG-driven purpose. A chart highlights rising CEO confidence in economic growth from 2020 to 2021.

Shows CEO concerns over economic, policy, social, and environmental threats.

Examines the CET1 capital ratio evolution, detailing influences from dividends, share repurchases, and regulatory impacts. This slide is essential for stakeholders interested in the firm's capital management strategies and regulatory compliance.

Examines UBS's capital strength for 4Q23, focusing on the CET1 ratio, and explaining factors affecting the ratio over the quarter.

Explanation of CET1 capital ratio changes and regulatory capital requirements

Analyzes the CET1 capital ratio's stability through quarterly changes, highlighting the impacts of market risks, operational changes, and capital strategies. It provides insights into the bank’s capital adequacy to meet regulatory requirements and financial stability.

The slide focuses on the detailed factors affecting the Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio, illustrating how certain financial activities impact this key regulatory metric. It's used for in-depth risk management assessments, showcasing compliance with financial regulations, and strategic financial planning.

This slide discusses the CET1 ratio's quarterly changes, regulatory requirements, and the current capital ratio compared to regulatory targets.

This slide aggregates CET1 stress test results at the national level. Denmark, France, and Germany show the worst capital depletion, while Hungary, Poland, and Norway perform best. The visual emphasizes geographical disparities in resilience and risk tolerance among EU member countries.

The slide illustrates the changes in UBS's CET1 capital and Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) between the first and second quarters of 2023, explaining the adjustments made for capital adequacy and risk management.

This slide explains changes in CET1 capital and risk-weighted assets (RWA) during Q3 2023, with regulatory impacts.

Analyzes the changes in CET1 capital ratio over a period, highlighting significant contributors and their impacts.

The slide illustrates the CET1 ratio movements and key messages related to financial health and regulatory requirements, emphasizing the bank's robust capital position and strategic targets.

Highlights the CET1 ratio's headroom above the minimum requirements, explaining the regulatory and leverage requirements and the bank's compliance status.

Explains movements in UBS’s CET1 capital ratio across 2Q24 to 3Q24, including profit impact, dividend accrual, RWA increase, and regulatory amortization changes. Commentary outlines strategic goals and regulatory expectations.

Highlights the CET1 ratio movements for Q423 and FY23, showing progress toward the target range. Includes figures for profits, buybacks, and other factors.

The slide shows CET1 and UK leverage ratios against regulatory minimum requirements, emphasizing the bank’s capital adequacy and compliance with financial regulations.

Shows CET1 ratio improvement to 13.8% in Q3 2024, driven by strong earnings and capital efficiency. Regulatory changes and RWA movements are detailed, with breakdowns by credit, market, and operational risks.

This slide breaks down movements in the CET1 ratio from 13.8% to 13.6% in Q4 2024. Key impacts include attributable profit, dividend accrual, FX adjustments, and the Tesco Bank acquisition. Maintains regulatory capital target range.

Shows Barclays’ CET1 ratio of 13.9% in Q1 2025, above the 12.2% minimum requirement. Provides context on Pillar 2A adjustment and flexibility under Basel 3.1. Emphasizes strong capital positioning and the bank’s ability to operate at the upper end of the target range.

This slide highlights a strong capital position with a CET1 ratio of 10.5%, above the regulatory minimum and within target range. It also shows a consistent decline in common shares outstanding while shareholders’ equity steadily increases over the years.

Displays quarterly changes in CET1 ratios influenced by regulatory adjustments, capital strategies, and market conditions. It underscores the bank's efforts in maintaining robust capital ratios through strategic financial management and regulatory compliance.

This slide illustrates changes in Barclays’ CET1 capital ratio throughout FY22, starting from 15.1% and ending at 13.9%. It breaks down the components affecting the ratio, including attributable profit, distributions, pension, fair value adjustments, and FX impacts.

Explains the factors influencing the CET1 capital ratio, crucial for understanding financial stability.

This slide projects the group’s CET1 ratio aiming for a target of more than 13.5% by 2025, explaining the various financial actions and changes that will influence this target.

Highlights Barclays' CET1 ratio within target range and above regulatory requirements, with leverage metrics.

Highlights improvement in CET1 ratio to 14.1% due to capital raises and reductions in risk-weighted assets, providing a stable capital base.

The slide highlights Deutsche Bank's CET1 ratio and risk-weighted asset trends, showing changes and factors affecting these metrics from Q4 2023 to Q1 2024.

This slide discusses the CET1 ratio within the target range and compares UK leverage requirements, emphasizing regulatory compliance and financial stability.

A dot matrix graph analyzing individual EU banks’ CET1 ratio shifts from 2021 to 2023 under stress conditions. Most banks remain above the 9% buffer, while one falls below the 5.5% threshold. Summary notes explain capital dispersion and highlight Banque Postale as the weakest performer.

Describes Barclays’ capital structure in Q1 2025, showing CET1, AT1, and T2 buffers relative to requirements. Demonstrates prudent capital planning and provides a maturity timeline for capital instruments. Emphasizes flexibility in capital deployment.

Communicates that Deutsche Bank maintains a strong capital buffer above CET1 and total capital requirements. Slide breaks down capital components and the regulatory thresholds, while noting quarter-on-quarter improvements and changes to T2 calculation rules.

It explains the factors influencing the capital ratio, with references to regulatory requirements and targets. Suitable for financial regulatory reporting, compliance discussions, or investor briefings on capital adequacy strategies.

The slide highlights long-term stability in Barclays' capital and liquidity metrics. CET1 ratio stays within target range; LDR remains conservative; liquidity and funding ratios consistently exceed regulatory minimums.

Shows how Barclays’ CET1 capital ratio (12.5%) and UK leverage ratio (5.9%) exceed regulatory minimums. Helps illustrate compliance strength, capital buffers, and the institution’s financial resilience against regulatory thresholds.

This slide illustrates the Bank Group's regulatory capital ratios as of December 2019, comparing the harmonised and APRA versions against Basel III minimums, potentially for a financial analysis or regulatory compliance presentation.

This slide provides a detailed view of the CET1 minimum requirements and leverage minimum requirements for financial entities as of December 2023, indicating regulatory compliance levels and financial health metrics.

This table quantifies individual bank performance under EBA stress testing, detailing CET1 depletion and assigned P2G buckets. It ranks banks by capital flexibility and provides quartile rankings. The focus is on differentiating capital capacity for dividends or buybacks, guiding regulatory interpretation of stress test results.

Shows quarter-over-quarter movement in UBS’s CET1 capital, Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA), and Leverage Ratio Denominator (LRD) from 3Q24 to 4Q24. Breaks down factors like tax expense, dividends, market risk, and currency effects contributing to changes in these key regulatory capital metrics.

Highlights quarterly changes in CET1 capital, risk-weighted assets, and leverage ratio denominator

This slide shows Deutsche Bank’s capital ratios are significantly above minimum regulatory requirements. The CET1 ratio has a 252bps buffer, while total capital has a 318bps buffer. The slide also breaks down regulatory minimums including Pillar 1 and 2, G-SIB, and countercyclical buffers. Highlights explain drivers of changes in buffer sizes and the impact of increased Pillar 2 requirements and changes in systemic buffer levels.

This slide compares CET1 depletion and capital flexibility by region (EU, US, UK) from 2010 to 2023. It shows regional trends and positions banks in “green” or “red” zones based on stress test outcomes. The EU shows high capital flexibility with moderate depletion, unlike the UK and US.

Continuation of the stress test depletion analysis, expanding bank-level comparisons across Spain, Finland, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, and more. Emphasizes capital weaknesses and resilience. Includes Banque Postale with extreme CET1 depletion (-1462bps).

CET1 ratio decreased slightly from 13.8% to 13.6% due to buybacks, FX impacts, and acquisitions, despite strong attributable profits. Each component’s impact shown in basis points, highlighting careful capital management.

Illustrates the movement in Barclays' CET1 ratio from Q424 to Q125, highlighting positive and negative contributors such as attributable profit, share buybacks, and RWA changes, ending at 13.9%.

Shows Barclays’ CET1 ratio (13.6%) exceeds the regulatory minimum (12.0%-12.2%) providing significant buffer. Explains expected future reduction in capital requirements and ongoing flexibility in managing regulatory capital targets.

Focuses on the bank's CET1 ratio movements within a target range, detailing specific impacts from dividends and other adjustments on capital.

Shows the progression of CET1 capital across different periods, highlighting the contributions and deductions leading to the final 3Q22 figure.

Shows Barclays’ CET1 and leverage ratios versus regulatory minimums as of H1 2024. Emphasizes that the bank holds capital well above the thresholds, ensuring a strong capital base and regulatory compliance.

Compares Q1 2024 capital metrics with Q4 2023, highlighting decreases in CET1 and leverage ratios due to capital changes and FX effects. The slide shows MREL/TLAC composition and surplus over regulatory requirements.

Provides a detailed overview of Deutsche Bank’s capital metrics as of Q1 2025. It includes movements in CET1 and leverage ratios and shows sufficient MREL/TLAC buffers above regulatory requirements.

Summarizes capital adequacy and regulatory ratios as of Q2 2024. The CET1 and leverage ratios improved, driven by capital changes. MREL/TLAC status shows a surplus above requirements, reinforcing financial strength amid regulatory requirements.

This slide compares Barclays' actual CET1 and UK leverage ratios against regulatory minimums. It demonstrates that the bank maintains sufficient capital and leverage buffers above the required thresholds, remaining in its 13–14% CET1 target range.

Outlines changes in capital ratios (CET1, leverage) and capital buffer compliance (MREL/TLAC). Discusses effects from earnings, FX, regulation, and litigation settlements. Emphasizes strength in regulatory buffers and stable leverage.

Shows that Barclays exceeds FY24 minimum CET1 (10.6%) and UK leverage (3.45%) requirements with actual ratios of 12.1% and 5.8% respectively. Charts break down the components of regulatory minimums and the capital buffers in place.

Presents historical trends (2019–Q125) for CET1 ratio, loan-to-deposit ratio, liquidity coverage ratio, and net stable funding ratio, emphasizing prudence and consistency across regulatory and capital metrics.

This slide displays the CET1 ratio movements over a period with a focus on financial metrics and future considerations for maintaining the capital ratio. It highlights key impacts and planned financial adjustments.

Highlights CET1 ratio movements and the significant headroom to the MDA, including regulatory updates and key financial data.

Explains the strong CET1 ratio and the significant headroom to the MDA, including key regulatory and financial metrics.

The slide presents the target CET1 ratio of greater than 13.5% by 2025, outlining the steps and capital actions required to achieve this financial stability goal.

This slide outlines the stability of the CET1 ratio at 13.8% despite market fluctuations. It shows the impact of CRR3, FX effects, and capital changes. Risk-weighted assets slightly decreased to €352bn. The highlights explain how capital efficiency measures and operational risk RWA changes contributed to the overall CET1 stability and provide context for the underlying asset and risk trends.

The slide indicates Deutsche Bank’s CET1 ratio stability at 13.8%, detailing drivers of change such as FX effects, RWA changes, and capital movements. The slide also projects the impact of CRR3 regulation expected in Q1 2025.

A historical bar chart tracks CET1 ratio shifts during past EBA stress tests, comparing capital depletion (bps) and capital flexibility. 2023 results show slightly less depletion than 2021, with better capital buffers. Emphasizes the importance of resilience under severe scenarios.

The slide provides a detailed breakdown of the CET1 ratio requirements and actual performance, emphasizing regulatory minimums and the current status within the target range for capital adequacy.

This slide presents the results of a CFO survey covering nine CEE countries with 312 responses, conducted between May and August 2022.

Discusses the shifting priorities of CFOs during the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the focus on cashflow management as the highest priority, followed by forecasting and people management. This indicates a strategic pivot towards essential financial management and resilience building in uncertain times.

Discusses the resources necessary for CFOs to achieve their business priorities, including investment in IT infrastructure, stakeholder alignment, and team skills. The pie chart visually represents the distribution of these resources, highlighting the critical areas for successful financial management.

Analyzes the primary business priorities for CFOs and stakeholders, focusing on performance, transformation, risk management, and transactions. The charts provide a visual comparison of these priorities and their relative importance, revealing areas of alignment and divergence.

Details the allocation of CFOs' time across various functions, emphasizing differences between formal and informal practices. Highlights the importance of flexibility and adaptability in CFO roles, supported by a quote from a private equity investor discussing the need for versatile financial leadership.

Analyzes the inverse relationship between rising COVID-19 cases and falling case fatality rates globally, with three main causes: better identification, different age mix, and improved treatment.

Shows that despite a spike in COVID-19 cases in the U.S., the case fatality rate (CFR) and deaths have not risen proportionately. Explains this trend with factors such as increased testing, changes in age mix of cases, and better treatment protocols.

Shows that the global daily COVID-19 CFR has declined and converged around 2% across regions. Introduces the distinction between CFR and IFR and discusses why CFR may vary.

This slide explains the funding allocation under the US CHIPS Act, emphasizing that only 5% is directed to legacy chip production. It breaks down how over $52B will be spent, highlighting delays in impact and lack of support for industrial/automotive applications.

This slide presents a breakdown of CHIPS Act spending from 2022–2026. It categorizes appropriations for R&D, loan programs, tax credits, and specific funds for semiconductor development and innovation. It communicates strategic investment priorities for boosting U.S. technology leadership.